Data are central to Fed policymaking, and that's a good thing. However, data are imperfect and do not speak for themselves, so sometimes they lead us astray.
Excellent post, especially the deep background in the 56-page procedure report. As a matter of curiosity, have they tested their 25/75 dispersion measure with subsequent data since 1996? Thanks for your work!
Great article and drill down into the Michigan Sentiment and its revision. Small number of respondents having a potential big sway on public policy. Thanks for the insights.
Excellent post, especially the deep background in the 56-page procedure report. As a matter of curiosity, have they tested their 25/75 dispersion measure with subsequent data since 1996? Thanks for your work!
Great article and drill down into the Michigan Sentiment and its revision. Small number of respondents having a potential big sway on public policy. Thanks for the insights.