25 Comments

Thanks for another clear and informative letter. (Also, the latent grammarian in me repects the use of the plural verb-form with "data.")

Expand full comment
Sep 19Liked by Claudia Sahm

50 basis points. You nailed that with your explanation and prediction. I’m not surprised. Congratulations.

Expand full comment

As always, clear, nuanced, and illuminating. SO rare in the current discourse. Thank you, thank you.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you!

Expand full comment

So, wait... there's a downward revision of the March 2023 employment levels? So, if the data had come in accurately in March of 2023, the Fed likely wouldn't have felt the need to raise rates?

Expand full comment

A really great analysis founded in current data and context. It is really refreshing to see the whole analysis put forward on its own intrinsic economic analysis with reference to current politics. It goes without saying that any cut in the rate may accrue to the benefit of the Democrats in the current election cycle. Hopefully this is not a consideration at the Fed. One should note that this is in marked contrast to the other most important "independent" federal democratic institution - the Supreme Court - which has been so extremely partisan that it will be tainted for a long time.

Expand full comment

I sort of missed the bandwagon on finding a good dividend via equities. I was pretty happy with 5% on my cash, down 50 so soon kinda makes me sad.

Expand full comment

"Since the Fed ramped up communication policy under Bernanke, it is unusual for markets to be so uncertain about the vote's outcome within days of the meeting. The market odds have been shifting around. Normally, Fed officials, especially the Chair, telegraph the decision with a high likelihood ahead of time."

This kind of "forward guidance" is pernicious. It only serves to reduce Fed's ability to respond to changing circumstances, to be data dependent. Uncertainty about future decisions of the Fed is normal and desirable. The certainty should be that the Fed is aiming for 2% PCE. Market participants will have different ideas about what the Fed ought to do (=about what the Fed WILL do) to achieve that.

Expand full comment

" Normalizing the funds rate will be tricky when the neutral rate is unknown, the data are noisy, and historical relationships remain less relevant. "

Normalizing implies a static level. There should be no presumption that maintaining the taregt inflation rate implies a static EFFR. THAT depends on savings investment behavior, especially whether deficits will be slightly irresponsible under Harris or wildly irresponsible under Trump.

I agree that 50 is better but only becasue the Fed failed to start cutting much earlier.

Expand full comment

Time to find out whats possible

Cut the policy rate to expected zero real

Where it was in 2019 and oughta be always

Control credit flow overtly

With an explicit target

Credit ration system

Police portfolios to

Keep standards in line

with expect credit outcomes not expectation price level movement

Price level needs direct stand by

Floor and ceiling regs

Expand full comment

Until we reclaim our natural resources, then commodities will continue to be piss ants

Expand full comment

What about the tri-mandate? Ensuring a liquid and functioning treasury market? We all saw what happened when carry trade collapsed, would 50 bps hurt global Eurodollar liquidity?

Expand full comment

" the data suggest the funds rate pushed the labor market away from maximum employment, even as disinflation was underway"

That was avoidable

And should never happen

Expand full comment

I've lived in community's with a single daily newspaper (yup, this dates me--but it's just a fable)

and many local citizens have a very dim view of their paper's editorial points of view--especially when it comes to endorsing a candidate for election. Indeed, many may think that the endorsement can be a "kiss of death."

This story, as you might guess, involves Claudia Sahm's endorsement of "50" and I wonder, Claudia, if it may not be the ol'kiss of death given your past history with the Fed.?

I'm a very long term fan with great respect for you so--for goodness sake--don't take this wrong.

Expand full comment
Sep 19Liked by Claudia Sahm

I don't know @mmb-phx, seems like she nailed it to me!

Expand full comment

The neutral rate

Is a unicorn.

A poetic license

No policy rate of interest

can settle price level change to zero

or any other steady rate of change

Just as no rate of unemployment

Is neutral

And yet

The Laissez faire fantasy machine

Never sleeps

Expand full comment

I’m sick and tired of hearing dumb and stupid people talk about communism. The federal reserve board is communism by any definition.

Expand full comment

No its the state

operating the credit system

on behalf of finance capital

Expand full comment

State operation sounds like communism to me, brother

Expand full comment

Bravo higher powers

Apparently not powerful enough however

Need some bottom up help

Lets organize community actions

Ps job sites are communities

too of course

And there

Job holders self organization

Faces a cyclops

Expand full comment
founding

So if the army is operated by the state it would be a communist army?

Fed has a mandate to maintain full employment and a stable currency, those are good, worthwhile goals to strive for. Our country is better off when people who want to work are working.

Expand full comment

Yes

Terms require sorting and careful deploying to clarify not muddle

A subject

A community

Orientation

Over and against

An individualist orientation

Is not what we call communism

Ie

The absence

Of

Household / individual property rights

Expand full comment

my pov , the major global economic, political issue is social democracy vs liberal democracy, ie community rights vs individual rights... per the urantia papers, god values community rights vs not respecting as much invidual rights

Expand full comment
Sep 17·edited Sep 17

ub says boatloads,... god doesn't respect persons... vs the greater good, my interpretation god cares about we the people, not i the invidual as such. god cares about the greater good not the Invidual good, my pov

Expand full comment